Second and third rounds on the dossier pipeline, reviewed locally before commit. Retrieval - wayback_pass.py: retries every BLOCKED/DEAD/THIN/ERROR linked source through the Wayback Machine; blocks carry the snapshot date, archive URL and the live verdict. 143 slots retried: 93 fetched, 37 no snapshot, 12 script shells, 1 PDF. - fetch_sources.py: fetch_wayback() helper. - add_extra_sources.py: files staged extra_* finds (web search, not on the DB record) into the store with a provenance note. - Cases re-sourced by web search: 248 (Oslo: Document.no, Avisa Oslo, NRK; the linked Le Parisien piece is case 242 and is marked OFF-CASE), 258 Kharkiv, 260 Singapore, 358 Bangkok, 365 Las Vegas, 388 Verneuil-sur-Seine, 390 Zoersel, 430 Homestead. 341 of 364 cases now hold a fetched article; 11, 66 and 399 have no public text source (podcast, police video, direct victim report). Trimming - auto_trim.py: case-anchored furniture cut for UNTRIMMED blocks. Finds the body run that mentions the case, merges across subheadings and short furniture gaps, drops teasers, share bars, date/URL/caption lines and subscription pitches; refuses pages with no record term or almost no body. 302 blocks trimmed; 16 left on auto-trim-review.md (7 OFF-CASE suspects). Every cut is labelled AUTO-TRIMMED, UNREVIEWED in the dossier; the full extract stays in staging/. Decisions with anchors in trim-decisions-auto.json. - build_cases.py / verify_all.py: banners for auto-trimmed and archived blocks, staged-file check extended to Wayback blocks, flag legend under the record. Detention rule - README "Definitions": the DB field `kidnappings` is the DETENTION violence type (victim, guard, staff or relative held to force submission or execute the theft), distinct from the Kidnapping scenario (taken away and held). - detention-flag-review.md / detention-flag-corrections.json: 40 records reviewed with evidence; 30 set-to-1 proposals accepted by the owner on 2026-09-06 (listed in corrections-approved.md), 10 still open. - apply_detention_wording.py: "Violence Used" in the 70 reviewed summaries now names detention explicitly (62 of 70 labelled), supported by the summary's own text; idempotent; supersedes the batch scripts' wording. Worklist and docs - sofia-worklist.md: 248 decisions, detention rule item replacing the old "no abduction" item, fresh-search section for the textless cases. - README-START-HERE.md: progress notes, run commands, next steps. - Bug fixed in passing: Wayback blocks stored in-memory text with carriage returns; now stored as read back from disk. verify_all.py PASSES (2321 checks). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GZZENdTLzNGsbNy4DyF1yt
120 lines
9.2 KiB
Plaintext
120 lines
9.2 KiB
Plaintext
================================================================================================
|
||
CASE 117 | Vinay Jain | February 3, 2022 | India
|
||
================================================================================================
|
||
|
||
DATABASE RECORD
|
||
id 117
|
||
date February 3, 2022
|
||
original_date February 3, 2022
|
||
year 2022
|
||
month 2
|
||
quarter 2022-Q1
|
||
victim Vinay Jain
|
||
location Surat, India
|
||
country India
|
||
scenario P2P Trade Gone Wrong
|
||
description Auto parts businessman brings suitcase full of $260K worth of cash to do an in-person crypto trade, gets beaten and robbed by 8 men.
|
||
kidnappings 0
|
||
violence_torture 0
|
||
drugs_alcohol 0
|
||
weapons 1
|
||
theft 1
|
||
life_taken 0
|
||
money_wanted (null)
|
||
coin_type (null)
|
||
reports ToI
|
||
notes (null)
|
||
has_processed_date 1
|
||
created_at 2025-11-13 05:44:45
|
||
(flag legend: 'kidnappings' is the DETENTION flag — 1 when the victim was held against
|
||
their will at any point, tied, locked in, held at gunpoint or taken away; it is NOT the
|
||
same as the 'Kidnapping' scenario, which means taken away and held. See README, Definitions.)
|
||
|
||
AI SUMMARY [generated at bulk import, NOT verified against sources]
|
||
**Victim:** Vinay Jain
|
||
|
||
**Attackers:** Unknown number of perpetrators
|
||
|
||
**Attack Method:** P2P Trade Gone Wrong
|
||
|
||
**Violence Used:** Threats/intimidation
|
||
|
||
**Crypto Stolen:** Approximately $260k
|
||
|
||
**Status:** Investigation ongoing
|
||
|
||
LINKED SOURCES
|
||
[url] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/surat/cryptocurrency-deal-turns-into-2cr-dacoity/articleshow/89392699.cms
|
||
|
||
NOTES ON THIS FILE
|
||
* matched to sheet row 118: exact match on victim + year, unique on both sides
|
||
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
ARTICLE 1
|
||
Source ToI
|
||
URL https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/surat/cryptocurrency-deal-turns-into-2cr-dacoity/articleshow/89392699.cms
|
||
Origin reported_K&R sheet, row 118, column "Articles"
|
||
Length 2,430 chars
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Surat: Cryptocurrency Deal Turns into Rs 2 Crore Dacoity
|
||
On Friday afternoon, a hoax call about an alleged armed robbery at an angadia firm opposite Varachha police station sent the police on a wild goose chase. The situation only became clear late on Saturday night when it was revealed to be a massive dacoity worth Rs 2 crore.
|
||
The incident occurred right under the police's nose, but the lack of any complaints initially led the cops to consider closing the case as a hoax call. However, the emergence of a Hyderabad-based victim at the police station changed everything. This victim, an auto parts businessman, filed a complaint of dacoity, finally piecing together the puzzle for the police.
|
||
Based on his complaint, Varachha police registered an offense of dacoity (IPC 395) against Pintoo Kumar Jha, Amit, Suman Singh, Madhukar, Rakesh, Raju, Vicky, Shahrukh, and several others.
|
||
According to the case details, Vinay Jain (29), a resident of Film Nagar in Hyderabad, told the Varachha police that he had come to Surat to invest in cryptocurrency. He had been lured by the accused but was instead looted of Rs 2 crore.
|
||
Two months prior, Jain had met Lakshminarayan in Hyderabad, who deals in cryptocurrency. Lakshminarayan lured Jain to invest in crypto for better returns and introduced him to P K Jha. After several meetings with Jha in Hyderabad, Jain, along with his brother Aakash, Lakshminarayan, and driver Shinu, drove to Surat in his father's Fortuner car on February 3. Before leaving, Jain deposited Rs 6 crore in an angadia firm, which he later collected in Surat. Jain claimed he had gathered the amount from his relatives to invest in crypto.
|
||
The next day, Vinay Jain and the three others reached the angadia firm, 'Shree Siddhi Vinayak Enterprise,' located at Central Bazar in Varachha, with Rs 2 crore to open his crypto account. Jha took the cash but did not transfer it to Jain's account. As Jha prepared to leave with the cash, Jain asked him to wait until the account showed the money. This led to an altercation, and around eight other people joined in, thrashing Jain and the others before disappearing with the money before the police arrived.
|
||
It was later revealed that the accused had planned to beat them up and steal the cash. Jain and the other three left the city after the incident and reached Mumbai. However, they decided to file a police complaint and returned to Surat on Saturday to do so.
|
||
|
||
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
FETCHED ARTICLE 1 [AUTO-TRIMMED — UNREVIEWED]
|
||
!! Furniture was cut by a script keyed on this case's record, not by a person.
|
||
!! It may still carry passages about OTHER cases from a round-up article.
|
||
!! The full page extract is kept in staging/ if a cut needs revisiting.
|
||
Source timesofindia.indiatimes.com
|
||
URL https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/surat/cryptocurrency-deal-turns-into-2cr-dacoity/articleshow/89392699.cms
|
||
Field url
|
||
Retrieved 2026-09-05T12:52:41+00:00 via raw HTTP retrieval, deterministic extraction (HTTP 200)
|
||
Language unknown
|
||
Kept paragraphs headline [0] + 2-14 of 55
|
||
Length 3,044 chars
|
||
Integrity sha256 dad83793913b09f8c31ee6cfe568aa83be74c91bcb12b6870bea6526c36a7c8e
|
||
Trimmed AUTO-TRIMMED, unreviewed: kept paragraphs 2-14 plus headline [0]; dropped 1 leading and 40 trailing paragraphs. Case-term hits on page: 28.
|
||
Caveat retrieved from a live page on the date above. Unlike text copied
|
||
from the spreadsheet, there is no second copy to hash it against.
|
||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
ORIGINAL (unknown, verbatim as retrieved)
|
||
|
||
Cryptocurrency Deal Turns Into 2cr Dacoity | Surat News - Times of India
|
||
|
||
The hoax call about an alleged armed robbery at angadia firm opposite Varachha police station that led the police into a wild goose chase on Friday afternoon finally turned out to be a huge case of dacoity worth Rs 2 crore late on Saturday night.
|
||
|
||
CCTV grab shows the accused fleeing the spot with the money
|
||
|
||
SURAT: The hoax call about an alleged armed robbery at angadia firm opposite Varachha police station that led the police into a wild goose chase on Friday afternoon finally turned out to be a huge case of dacoity worth Rs 2 crore late on Saturday night.
|
||
|
||
While it had all happened right under the police’s nose, the entire episode got too confusing sans any complaints filed leading cops about to close the case as a hoax call.
|
||
|
||
However, a Hyderabad-based victim emerged at the police station to file a complaint of dacoity.
|
||
|
||
The emergence of the victim, an auto parts businessman, cleared the picture after the pieces fit like a jig-saw puzzle, even as cops could not find a complainant then at the spot that day. Based on his complaint, Varachha police registered an offence of dacoity (IPC 395) against Pintoo Kumar Jha, Amit, Suman Singh, Madhukar, Rakesh, Raju, Vicky, Shahrukh and some other people.
|
||
|
||
According to the case details, Vinay Jain (29), a resident of Film Nagar in Hyderabad told the Varachha police that he had come to the city to invest in cryptocurrency after being lured by the accused, but instead got looted of Rs 2 crore.
|
||
|
||
“Around two months ago, Jain came in contact with one Lakshminarayan in Hyderabad who deals in cryptocurrency. Lakshminarayan lured Jain to invest in crypto for better returns, and after he agreed, introduced him to P K Jha.
|
||
|
||
After a few meetings with Jha in Hyderabad, Jain along with his brother Aakash, Lakhminarayan and driver Shinu drove down to Surat in his father’s Fortuner car on February 3. Before embarking on their Surat journey, Jain deposited Rs 6 crore in an angadia firm there which he later collected in Surat. Jain claimed he had collected the amount from his relatives to invest in crypto,” said the police.
|
||
|
||
The next day, Vinay Jain along with the three others reached the angadia firm named ‘Shree Siddhi Vinayak Enterprise’ located at Central Bazar in Varachha with Rs 2 crore to open his crypto account. Jha took the cash amount from Jain, but the money did not get transferred in Jain’s account for a long time.
|
||
|
||
In the meantime, Jha prepared to leave the place with the cash, when Jain asked him to wait till the account showed his money.
|
||
|
||
This started an altercation when around eight other people joined him and started to thrash Jain and others before disappearing with the amount before cops reached the scene.
|
||
|
||
“It was a pre plan by the accused to beat them up and steal the cash. Jain and the other three left the city after the incident and reached Mumbai. However, they decided to file a police complaint and returned again to Surat on Saturday and filed a complaint,” cops added.
|
||
|
||
================================================================================================
|
||
generated from attacks-export-Gart-website.json + reported_K&R | case 117
|
||
================================================================================================
|